<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you sure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://perspx.com/blog/archives/1157/are-you-sure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://perspx.com/blog/archives/1157/are-you-sure/</link>
	<description>Musings of a teenage programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:14:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Perspx</title>
		<link>http://perspx.com/blog/archives/1157/are-you-sure/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Perspx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perspx.com/?p=1157#comment-162</guid>
		<description>&gt; The sad thing is that none of this is actually new, and all halfway competent programmers already kind of know about it, and yet the problem prevails.

Yes it is irritating; I think the problem is that developers are reluctant or too lazy to invest time into such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> The sad thing is that none of this is actually new, and all halfway competent programmers already kind of know about it, and yet the problem prevails.</p>
<p>Yes it is irritating; I think the problem is that developers are reluctant or too lazy to invest time into such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konrad</title>
		<link>http://perspx.com/blog/archives/1157/are-you-sure/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perspx.com/?p=1157#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Great posting. The sad thing is that none of this is actually new, and all halfway competent programmers already kind of know about it, and yet the problem prevails. Take Firefox: “Do you really want to irreparably destroy your 50 open tabs when exiting?” – Effin’ stupid question. Why the hell would I want that? Why give me the option? And yet there are “experts” working on these user interfaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great posting. The sad thing is that none of this is actually new, and all halfway competent programmers already kind of know about it, and yet the problem prevails. Take Firefox: “Do you really want to irreparably destroy your 50 open tabs when exiting?” – Effin’ stupid question. Why the hell would I want that? Why give me the option? And yet there are “experts” working on these user interfaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
