<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Psychology of Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://perspx.com/blog/archives/1298/the-psychology-of-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://perspx.com/blog/archives/1298/the-psychology-of-software/</link>
	<description>Musings of a teenage programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 09:14:03 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Perspx</title>
		<link>http://perspx.com/blog/archives/1298/the-psychology-of-software/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Perspx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 09:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perspx.com/?p=1298#comment-169</guid>
		<description>&gt; But I wouldn’t fully agree with “use software as short as possible and get on with the life”. For some people “getting on with life” is using the software itself!

I think most of the time it isn’t, except the obvious exceptions in entertainment such as video games or software used on your DVD player or whatever. If you are using a spreadsheet, even if you use it most of the time, it’s not something you really *want* to be using.

And to that end, making software easier to use and more intuitive by catering to *how* users are going to use it is always a winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> But I wouldn’t fully agree with “use software as short as possible and get on with the life”. For some people “getting on with life” is using the software itself!</p>
<p>I think most of the time it isn’t, except the obvious exceptions in entertainment such as video games or software used on your DVD player or whatever. If you are using a spreadsheet, even if you use it most of the time, it’s not something you really *want* to be using.</p>
<p>And to that end, making software easier to use and more intuitive by catering to *how* users are going to use it is always a winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eimantas</title>
		<link>http://perspx.com/blog/archives/1298/the-psychology-of-software/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Eimantas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://perspx.com/?p=1298#comment-167</guid>
		<description>How about testing with your non-dev friends? Even better with computer illiterate users? This way your app should be as idiot-proof as possible.

But I wouldn&#039;t fully agree with &quot;use software as short as possible and get on with the life&quot;. For some people &quot;getting on with life&quot; is using the software itself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about testing with your non-dev friends? Even better with computer illiterate users? This way your app should be as idiot-proof as possible.</p>
<p>But I wouldn&#8217;t fully agree with &#8220;use software as short as possible and get on with the life&#8221;. For some people &#8220;getting on with life&#8221; is using the software itself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
